For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Jeep Wrangler have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Toyota 4Runner doesn’t offer pretensioners for its second-row seat belts.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, Full-Time Four-Wheel Drive is standard on the Wrangler. But it costs extra on the 4Runner.
Both the Wrangler and the 4Runner have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Jeep Wrangler is safer than the Toyota 4Runner:
|
Wrangler |
4Runner |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
153 |
267 |
Neck Injury Risk |
34.1% |
47% |
Neck Stress |
337 lbs. |
438 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
417/461 lbs. |
488/468 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
3 Stars |
HIC |
281 |
367 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.7 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
38% |
57% |
Neck Stress |
217 lbs. |
271 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.